Shaping US Politics from the 19th Century

In the 19th century, Andrew Jackson was the first president to come from a humble background. He was the 7th president in the year 1829. He was known to be the one who influenced democracy in the United States. Being the first president to come from a humble background, he was known to speak for the people because he knew how they felt because he lived through the same circumstances as them. He spoke for farmers and laborers especially. Many of the elites were not a fan of Jackson due to him constantly doing things in favor of the majority. Andrew Jackson expanded suffrage and fixed the majority of the federal institutions.

During this time period, however, democracy and freedom were primary for white men. Native Americans and slaves were not considered to have the same rights as white men. Though the early 19th century did bring social and economic changes to the nation which helped the progression of democracy.

Politicians in the 19th century had many ideas in trying to build up the country for the better. Due to knowing the failure of the Articles of Confederation, they wanted to try a new way of creating a government where the federal government was in charge of things instead of giving the states the power. These short of change created fear in the American people because they did not want their ability to exercise their independent freedom to be jeopardized. Politicians, such as Alexander Hamilton and James Madison, made sure to explain that the constitution was against tyranny and was in favor of democracy. Their claim was also backed up with the checks and balances that were in the constitution. The checks and balances made sure to avoid any issues and corruption. The articles of confederation were viewed as useless because it did not help or ease any national issues that the country was facing, so the new constitution was going to create a balance between national power and the power to the people.

Slavery characterized American understandings of opportunity in the frontier time and the nineteenth century. Indeed, even as Americans praised their opportunity, the "envisioned network" of the American republic those qualified for appreciate the "favors of freedom" ensured by the Constitution came to be characterized by race. No dark individual, proclaimed the Supreme Court on the eve of the Civil War, would ever be an American resident. However simultaneously, the battle by untouchables and pariahs the abolitionists, the slaves and liberated individuals themselves revived the thought of opportunity as a general inheritance, a really human perfect. The standards of inheritance citizenship and equivalent security of the law regardless of race, which became focal components of American opportunity, were results of the abolitionist battle and Civil War.

If you think that the society around you expects courage, you may be scared as the dickens but you're not going to say it to a pollster," says Peter Stearns, author of ​American Fear: The Causes and Consequences of High Anxiety​. "Currently, fear has become in some ways slightly fashionable, so maybe people are even exaggerating a little bit." There are additionally contrasts in dangers that can influence how individuals see dread. For instance living through the Cold War, with its consistent ghost of atomic assault, required a capacity not to live in an unending condition of dread so as to work, Stearns notes. The most recent decade, paradoxically, has seen a relentlessly elevated level of dread punctuated by jostling spikes, instead of a progressive cultural assimilation.

Another outstanding contrast today is that numerous individuals feel that they may need to face dangers all alone. The assault on Pearl Harbor wasn't so frightening on the grounds that even individuals who couldn't help contradicting Roosevelt's strategies to a great extent accepted that the U.S. military could shield the country and in the long run success the war.

In the last presidential political race, two strange competitors — Donald Trump from the privilege and Bernie Sanders from the left — concluded that they could profit by feeding the apprehensions of voters as opposed to quieting them. Both comprehended something that progressively customary up-and-comers like Jeb Bush and Hillary Clinton didn't: countless Americans never again believed the consolations legislators had consistently advertised. Rather, a large number of us needed our pioneers to enjoy our interests and assist us with distinguishing substitutes who we could then fault for our issues.

Fear is infectious. In the course of the most recent two years, the positions of scared Americans have kept on developing. The two explicit statistic bunches that energized the 2016 battle have been joined by a lot bigger quantities of voters on the two sides of the path. On one side are the individuals who dread that in view of their sexual orientation, race, ethnicity or movement status they are being denied of their legitimate chance to partake in the American dream. On the opposite side are those, similarly as alarmed, who stress that they are having a lot of that equivalent American dream taken from them as the country's economy and culture change in manners they don't get it. American democracy government is an administration which whom the power is vested by the individuals. The United States government has satisfied the American vote based system in any case, there has been significant fulfilments that have not been completed.

The American majority rule government is one of the most quiet sorts of government on the planet in spite of the fact that it is far from perfect world. The vote based system in which we live has numerous qualities and shortcomings. Neither qualities or shortcomings out gauge each other, yet it is important to have both because of the fluctuating definitions. A popular government is an administration that is controlled by the individuals. The legislators that we choose to run our legislature are human and they are helpless to mix-ups dependent on their own qualities and shortcomings. The qualities and shortcomings they have are reflected into our legislature however at any rate "we the individuals" choose them and they are not picked for us.