Pre-clinical Screening of Trypanocidal Drugs
|✅ Paper Type: Free Essay||✅ Subject: Biology|
|✅ Wordcount: 2030 words||✅ Published: 1st Jun 2018|
Evaluating the developmental toxicity of trypanocidal nitroaromatic compounds on zebrafish
Grace Buchanan-Kilbey1, Joshua Djumpah1, Maria V. Papadopoulou2, Lonqin Hu3, Shane R. Wilkinson1 and Rachel Ashworth1*
Running title: Preclinical screening of trypanocidal drugs
Current therapies against African and American trypanosomiasis are problematic and with no immediate prospect of a vaccine there is an urgent need for cheap, more effective treatments. To aid the drug discovery pipeline, we report a novel in vivo screening approach using zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos as a means of rapidly assessing a compounds developmental toxicity. This technique, amenable to high-throughput screening, was validated using several trypanocidal nitroaromatic prodrugs including nifurtimox and benznidazole.
If you need assistance with writing your essay, our professional essay writing service is here to help!Essay Writing Service
Over 10 million people are infected by Trypanosoma brucei and Trypanosoma cruzi, the causative agents of African and American trypanosomiasis respectively. Treatment is restricted to a small number of drugs but their use is controversial . Against this backdrop there is a need for the development of novel, more effective and safer drugs. One group of compounds shown to have trypanocidal activity are the nitrobenzyl phosphoramide mustards (NBPMs) prodrugs [2, 3]. Originally developed as anticancer agents, they consist of a nitrobenzyl group attached to the cytotoxic phosphoramide mustard moiety  (Figure 1). In reactions catalysed by type I nitroreductases (NTRs), the electron-withdrawing nitro group on the NBPM is converted to an electron-donating hydroxylamine. This promotes an electronic rearrangement in the structure’s backbone resulting in cleavage of the benzylic C-O bond, leading to the release the cytotoxic phosphoramide mustard. Selectivity of NBPMs is via the activation reaction as type I NTRs are absent from most eukaryotes, with trypanosomes being an exception .
Preclinical drug development requires cell culture and whole organism toxicity screening. One system that is increasingly being viewed as a useful, cost-effective model uses zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos , primarily because zebrafish eggs are laid externally and organ formation can be easily viewed throughout development. Moreover, there is a high degree of similarity in physiological function between zebrafish and mammals, for example in their cardiovascular and nervous systems [7-9]. These and several other factors all make zebrafish particularly useful as a vertebrate model in which to study drug action .
Using the trypanocidal compounds nifurtimox, benznidazole and two NBPMs (LH34 and LH37) (Figure 1), we set about establishing a zebrafish toxicity screening assay. Embryos collected by natural spawning and staged according to Kimmel et al. (1995) were placed in 1 ml embryo medium and incubated at 28.5°C . At 24 hours post fertilisation (hpf), which corresponds to the end of the segmentation stage when the primary stages of organogenesis are complete and the fish has begun to move, the embryos were treated with different concentrations of drug, prepared using DMSO. After 6, 30 and 78 hours post-treatment, when the embryos had reached Prim-15 stage (30hpf), hatching (54hpf) and larva stages (102hpf), respectively, the embryonic phenotype was assessed and any gross developmental changes, such as alterations in heart beat, blood circulation, swimming behaviour and embryonic death, recorded. Other phenotypic changes were assessed by analysing tissue structure following immunocytochemical staining [12-14].
In the absence of drug or in the presence of benznidazole, no significant phenotypic changes were observed to the embryos at any time point examined (Figure 2A). Analysis of other nitroaromatic agents indicated that several trypanocidal nitrotriazoles NS43 and NS18 behaved similarly (data not shown) [15, 16]. In contrast, incubation of embryos in nifurtimox, LH34 or LH37 resulted in weakened heart beat, pericardial oedema or death (Figure 2B, C and D). At the highest concentration (300ïM) and at 54hpf, all nifurtimox-treated embryos exhibited pericardial oedema, disruption to their swimming behaviour, were less responsive to touch and had reduced pigmentation, the latter is in agreement with the observation that nifurtimox affects melanocyte development in zebrafish  (Figure 2B). By 102hpf, nifurtimox-treated embryos were dead (300μM) or displaying pericardial oedema (100μM). LH34-treated embryos displayed no developmental defects until 54hpf where ~50% and ~75% of embryos were dead or presenting with pericardial oedema at 100μM and 300μM, respectively (Figure 2C). Defective movement, slower swimming behaviour and an impaired touch response were also observed even in embryos maintained in drug concentrations as low as 33.3μM. By 102hpf, 100% embryonic death was observed using 300μM LH34, with cardiovascular impairment noted in the live embryos maintained in 100μM drug. For LH37-treated embryos, no developmental defects were detected at 30hpf (Figure 2D). By 54hpf, ~90% of embryos in medium containing 100μM LH37 displayed pericardial oedema and significant embryonic death (~80%) recorded at 300μM. As for LH34, embryos incubated in 33.3μM or 100µM LH37 exhibited an impaired, slowed swimming behaviour and were non-response to touch. By 102hpf, most embryos were dead in the 100μM and 300μM LH37-treated groups.
The above phenotypic analysis indicated that high concentrations of nifurtimox, LH34 or LH37 caused disruption to the movement and swimming behaviour suggesting that they may affect neuromuscular tissues. Immunocytochemical staining of drug-treated embryos using sarcomeric myosin heavy chain and actin markers for the slow and fast type of muscle fibres respectively , revealed defects in the skeletal muscle, with the somites displaying anteroposterior compression and the fibres having a wavy and misaligned appearance (data for LH37 treatment is shown in Figure 3A). For LH37 but not nifurtimox and LH34 (all at 100μM), this was accompanied by a significant reduction in the dorsal somite width when compared to controls (Figure 3B). When the tissue structure of the central nervous system and heart was assessed using anti-tubulin or anti-cardiac myosin markers, respectively, in 48hpf embryos treated with 100μM LH34 or LH37 no gross morphological difference were observed between drug dosed samples and controls (data not shown).
Our work highlights the potential of a zebrafish embryo-based in vivo drug screening/toxicity assay, an approach readily amenable for high throughput analysis. The response to a given agent can be followed by monitoring phenotypic changes using direct, non-invasive observations followed by tissue specific immunocytochemical staining. The assay was initially validated using nifurtimox and benznidazole with the resultant zebrafish toxicity data showing that the nitrofuran caused more unwanted side effects as compared to the 2-nitroimidazole. Such issues in humans have led the withdrawal of nifurtimox in several Latin countries as an American trypanosomiasis treatment in favour of benznidazole, even though the latter compound does reportedly promote genotoxicity and other of side effects [18, 19]. In relation to NBPMs, we have shown that in this in vivo model, LH34 and LH37 both have toxicity issues at high concentrations (>100ïM) but these problems are offset by their significant trypanocidal activities (IC50 <10nM). Our screening data highlights the potential of zebrafish as a reliable reporter system for monitoring toxicity in a whole organism that will aid drug discovery not only against trypanosomal diseases but whole series of other ailments.
F59 and MF20 developed by F. Stockdale and D.A. Fischman were obtained from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank developed under the auspices of the NICHD and maintained by The University of Iowa. Wild type zebrafish strains (Tubingen) were bred and raised in-house at the zebrafish facility of Queen Mary University of London, UK.
1. Wilkinson, S.R. and J.M. Kelly, Trypanocidal drugs: mechanisms, resistance and new targets. Expert Rev Mol Med, 2009. 11: p. e31.
2. Hall, B.S., et al., Exploiting the drug-activating properties of a novel trypanosomal nitroreductase. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2010. 54(3): p. 1193-9.
3. Hu, L., et al., Synthesis and structure-activity relationships of nitrobenzyl phosphoramide mustards as nitroreductase-activated prodrugs. Bioorg Med Chem Lett, 2011. 21(13): p. 3986-91.
4. Hu, L., et al., Nitroaryl phosphoramides as novel prodrugs for E. coli nitroreductase activation in enzyme prodrug therapy. J Med Chem, 2003. 46(23): p. 4818-21.
5. Wilkinson, S.R., et al., A mechanism for cross-resistance to nifurtimox and benznidazole in trypanosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2008. 105(13): p. 5022-7.
6. Zon, L.I. and R.T. Peterson, In vivo drug discovery in the zebrafish. Nat Rev Drug Discov, 2005. 4(1): p. 35-44.
7. Chico, T.J., P.W. Ingham, and D.C. Crossman, Modeling cardiovascular disease in the zebrafish. Trends Cardiovasc Med, 2008. 18(4): p. 150-5.
8. Nemtsas, P., et al., Adult zebrafish heart as a model for human heart? An electrophysiological study. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 48(1): p. 161-71.
9. Rinkwitz, S., P. Mourrain, and T.S. Becker, Zebrafish: an integrative system for neurogenomics and neurosciences. Prog Neurobiol. 93(2): p. 231-43.
10. Peterson, R.T. and C.A. Macrae, Systematic approaches to toxicology in the zebrafish. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 52: p. 433-53.
11. Kimmel, C.B., et al., Stages of Embryonic Development of the Zebrafish. Developmental Dynamics, 1995. 203: p. 253-310.
12. Ashworth, R., F. Zimprich, and S.R. Bolsover, Buffering intracellular calcium disrupts motoneuron development in intact zebrafish embryos. Developmental Brain Research, 2001. 129(2): p. 169-179.
13. Brennan, C., et al., Acetylcholine and calcium signalling regulates muscle fibre formation in the zebrafish embryo. J Cell Sci, 2005. 118(Pt 22): p. 5181-90.
14. Westerfield, M., The Zebrafish Book: A guide for the laboratory use of zebrafish (Brachydanio rerio). 3rd ed., ed. 1995: Univ. of Oregon Press, Eugene.
15. Papadopoulou, M.V., et al., Novel 3-nitro-1H-1,2,4-triazole-based amides and sulfonamides as potential antitrypanosomal agents. J Med Chem, 2012. 55(11): p. 5554-65.
16. Papadopoulou, M.V., et al., Novel 3-nitro-1H-1,2,4-triazole-based aliphatic and aromatic amines as anti-chagasic agents. J Med Chem, 2012. 54(23): p. 8214-23.
17. Zhou, L., et al., ALDH2 mediates 5-nitrofuran activity in multiple species. Chem Biol. 19(7): p. 883-92.
18. Castro, J.A. and E.G. Diaz de Toranzo, Toxic effects of nifurtimox and benznidazole, two drugs used against American trypanosomiasis (Chagas’ disease). Biomed Environ Sci, 1988. 1(1): p. 19-33.
19. Castro, J.A., M.M. de Mecca, and L.C. Bartel, Toxic side effects of drugs used to treat Chagas’ disease (American trypanosomiasis). Hum Exp Toxicol, 2006. 25(8): p. 471-9.
Cite This Work
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below:
Related ServicesView all
DMCA / Removal Request
If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have your work published on UKEssays.com then please: